Journal of Researches in Mechanics of Agricultural Machinery

Journal of Researches in Mechanics of Agricultural Machinery

Investigating and comparing the environmental Impacts of greenhouse cucumber production with solar and fossil energy sources

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors
1 Department of Biosystem Engineering, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering, Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University, Sari, Iran .
2 Department of Biosystem Engineering, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering, Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University, Sari, Iran
3 Department of Mechanical Engineering of Biosystems, Faculty of Agriculture, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran
Abstract
This study investigates the life cycle assessment of cucumber greenhouse production in four cities, Karaj, Hashtgerd, Nazarabad, and Eshtehard, during the crop year 2016-2017, using three energy production systems: conventional (using electricity from fossil fuel sources and diesel for greenhouse heating), photovoltaic, and photovoltaic-thermal. The equivalent amounts of energy consumption were calculated and simulated using TRNSYS software to determine the fuel and electricity requirements of the photovoltaic and photovoltaic-thermal systems. In the next step, IMPACT2002+ method was used to investigate the pollution incidence in the scenarios for cucumber production. The results of life cycle assessments showed that in all photovoltaic system damage categories, the emissions were the least. In addition, the results showed that the total emissions were the highest in the conventional system, followed by the photovoltaic thermal system in the next well. Simulation of solar systems also showed the maximum number of panels needed for photovoltaic and photovoltaic-thermal systems in greenhouse production of 160 and 159 in order to cultivate one ha of cucumber greenhouse production. The life cycle assessment results showed that in all damage categories of the photovoltaic solar system, it has the lowest emission. Also, in the three systems, diesel fuel, photovoltaic and photovoltaic-thermal systems and in parallel with in-field emissions, have the highest share in the injury category emissions. The results showed that the highest level of damage categories, include of human health and ecosystem quality, are 0.005 DALY and 9215 PDF*m2*yr, respectively, in the scenario of energy production using the photovoltaic system and in the damage categories, include of climate change and resource amount of 6629 kg CO2 eq. and 145446 MJ primary were obtained using the conventional energy production system. Results showed that the photovoltaic solar system was the best scenario in all three scenarios.
Keywords
Subjects

Abeliotis, K., Detsis, V., & Pappia, C. (2013). Life cycle assessment of bean production in the Prespa National Park, Greece. Journal of Cleaner Production, 41: 89-96.
 
Ali, Q., Yaseen, M. R., & Khan, M. T. I. (2019). Energy budgeting and greenhouse gas emission in cucumber under tunnel farming in Punjab, Pakistan. Scientia Horticulturae, 250: 168-173.
 
Ayali, H., & Movahed Kh. (2016). Determining the optimal direction of the central courtyard of Qajar houses in Shiraz based on the amount of solar energy received. Journal of Geography and Development, 14: 161-182. (In Persian)
 
Banaeian, N., Omid, M., & Ahmadi, H. (2011). Energy and economic analysis of greenhouse strawberry production in Tehran province of Iran. Energy Conversion and Management, 52(2): 1020-1025.
 
Bhatnagar, P.R. (2014). Strategies for protected cultivation for small and marginal farmers in India. In Agricculture: Towards a new paradigm of sustainability. New Delhi, India: Excellent publishing house.
 
Brentrup, F., Küsters, J., Kuhlmann, H., & Lammel, J. (2004). Environmental impact assessment of agricultural production systems using the life cycle assessment methodology: I. Theoretical concept of a LCA method tailored to crop production. European Journal of Agronomy, 20(3): 247–264.
 
Canakci, M., & Akinci, I. (2006). Energy use pattern analysis of greenhouse vegetable production. Energy, 31: 1243-1256.
 
Esen, M., & Yuksel, T. (2013). Experimental evaluation of using various renewable energy sources for heating a greenhouse. Energy and Buildings, 65: 340-351.
 
Ghasemi-Mobtaker, H., Mostashari-Rad, F., Saber, Z., Chau, K., Nabavi-Pelesaraei, A. (2020). Application of photovoltaic system to modify energy use, environmental damages and cumulative exergy demand of two irrigation systems-A case study: Barley production of Iran. Renewable Energy, 160: 1316-1334.
 
Heidari, M. D., & Omid, M. (2011). Energy use patterns and econometric models of major greenhouse vegetable productions in Iran. Energy, 36(1): 220-225.
 
Hosseini-Fashami, F., Motevali, A., Nabavi-Pelesaraei, A., Hashemi, S.J., & Chau, K. (2019). Energy-Life cycle assessment on applying solar technologies for greenhouse strawberry production. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 116: 109411.
 
Ingwersen, W. W. (2012). Life cycle assessment of fresh pineapple from Costa Rica. Journal of Cleaner Production, 35: 152-163.
 
ISO, (2006). ISO 14040: Environmental Management -Life Cycle Assessment- Requirements and Guidelines. International Organisation for Standardisation. Geneva, Switzerland.
 
Jolliet, O., Margni, M., Charles, R., Humbert, S., Payet, J., Rebitzer, G., & Rosenbaum, R. (2003). IMPACT 2002+: a new life cycle impact assessment methodology. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 8(6): 324.
 
Kalogirou, S. A. (2001). Use of TRNSYS for modelling and simulation of a hybrid PV–thermal solar system for Cyprus. Renewable Energy, 23(2): 247-260.
 
 
Khoshnevisan, B., Rafiee, S., Omid, M., Mousazadeh, H., & Clark, S. 2014. Environmental impact assessment of tomato and cucumber cultivation in greenhouses using life cycle assessment and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system. Journal of Cleaner Production, 73: 183-192.
 
Khoshnevisan, B., Rafiee, S., Omid, M., Yousefi, M., & Movahedi, M. (2013). Modeling of energy consumption and GHG (greenhouse gas) emissions in wheat production in Esfahan province of Iran using artificial neural networks. Energy, 52: 333-338.
 
Kouchaki-Penchah, H., Sharifi, M., Mousazadeh, H., Zarea-Hosseinabadi, H., & Nabavi-Pelesaraei, A. (2016). Gate to gate life cycle assessment of flat pressed particleboard production in Islamic Republic of Iran. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112: 343-350.
 
Mahdavi, S., Sarhaddi, F., & Hedayatizadeh, M. (2019). Energy/exergy based-evaluation of heating/cooling potential of PV/T and earth-air heat exchanger integration into a solar greenhouse. Applied Thermal Engineering, 149: 996-1007.
 
Nabavi-Pelesaraei, A., Azadi, H., Van Passele, S.,  Saber, Z.,  Hosseini-Fashami, F., Mostashari-Rad, F.,  Ghasemi-Mobtaker, H. (2021) Prospects of solar systems in production chain of sunflower oil using cold press method with concentrating energy and life cycle assessment. Energy, 223: 120117.
 
Nayak, S., & Tiwari, G. N. (2008). Energy and exergy analysis of photovoltaic/thermal integrated with a solar greenhouse. Energy and Buildings, 40(11): 2015-2021.
 
Neira, D. P., Montiel, M. S., Cabeza, M. D., & Reigada, A. (2018). Energy use and carbon footprint of the tomato production in heated multi-tunnel greenhouses in Almeria within an exporting agri-food system context. Science of the Total Environment, 628: 1627-1636.
 
OECD, (2001). Improving the Environmental Performance of Agriculture: Policy Options and Market Approaches, Paris. Available at: www.oecd.org/agr/env.
 
Paksoy, M., Turkmen, O., & Direk M. (2010). Importance of geothermal water using for greenhouse heating in Turkey, Selc UK Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences, 24(2): 50–53.
 
Pathak, H., & Wassmann, R. (2007). Introducing greenhouse gas mitigation as a development objective in rice-based agriculture: I. Generation of technical coefficients. Agricultural Systems, 94(3): 807-825.
 
Pishgar-Komleh, S. H., Ghahderijani, M., & Sefeedpari, P. (2012). Energy consumption and CO2 emissions analysis of potato production based on different farm size levels in Iran. Journal of Cleaner Production, 33: 183-191.
 
Rebitzer, G., Ekvall, T., Frischknecht, R., Hunkeler, D., Norris, G., & Rydberg, T. (2004). Life cycle assessment: Part 1: Framework, goal and scope definition, inventory analysis, and applications